“Election Year” Takes One Step Forward, But Two Back

The Purge franchise didn’t start off on the strongest note, with the original wasting a premise with a lot of potential on a typical home invasion flick. But, as many have stated, its sequel Anarchy breathed new life to the franchise, with a new lead in actor Frank Grillo and focusing on the ways the Purge could influence society in this film’s setting. This new direction was a smart place to take the series’s core concept, and exploring this more in Election Year was the right move on the directors part. But by focusing on the politics of the Purge, and less on the actual Purge itself, Election Year finds itself straying too far away from the elements that made the second film a hit.

The most notable flaw of Election Year is its failure to capture any amount of subtlety that that would help ground the films otherwise ludicrous scenario. Where previous films saw levels of brutality displayed through fairly simplistic ways, adding an eerie level of realism to the bloodshed, theres less of an attempt here at going for believability, with homemade booby traps, drones and even guillotines lining streets. While the outfits purgers wore in previous films seemed plausible, the ones in election year seem too extravagant and feel more like something a costume designer would think up, rather than a murdering psychopath. Even the villains are simplified for the worst where in previous films conveyed that there were different levels of bad people in the world of the purge, Election Year‘s villain’s Start their first scene by calling our female protagonist the c-word multiple times. The result ends up with what was subtext in previous films becoming text in this new installment, removing any potential depth to a film trying its hardest to sometimes say something meaningful.

This lack of plausibility and immersion also leads to a number of tonal shifts that tend to derail important scenes of the film. What should be a disturbing entrance for a pair of villains is undercut by the shockingly out of place sound of Miley Cyrus’s Party in the U.S.A., but then immediately expects its audience to be just as afraid as they were before. At several points, newcomer Mykelti Williamson (Bubba from Forest Gump) delivers a line that’s so out of left field, it almost derails the entire film, and delivers a caricature that barely avoids being somewhat racist towards African Americans. Even the action is subdued by the inconsistency at which it handles the horror elements, with shootouts trying to be both fun and scary seemingly at random intervals throughout the film. These flaws don’t add up to much on their own, but combined they hold back the elements of the film that do show the potential inherent within the idea of the Purge Universe.

For starters, returning lead Frank Grillo is as at home with the material as he was in the previous film, delivering a similar performance while still showing some growth to his character through subtle glimpses of hope towards the Senator he has to protect. Speaking of, actress Elizabeth Mitchell shows plenty of chemistry with Grillo, and the scenes where the two characters debate the ramifications of the purge on society tend to be the standout scenes in the film. In a world so full of insanity and pessimism as this, Mitchell’s character brings a refreshing level of optimism concerning the future, and reminds audiences of the inherent good that is still possible in people, despite how crazy and lost the world seems to have gotten. The Supporting cast mostly holds their own, minus Williamson’s Joe Dixon, but none of their performances ever go above being acceptable to get special recognition.

Also helping Election Year is the new approach the film takes in terms of structure. While the original was a sub-standard home invasion film, and Anarchy played out much like a Punisher film might, the new film is eerily reminiscent of John Carpenter’s Escape From New York, with Grillo’s character tasked with protecting a political target that’s targeted for assassination. As the pair explores more of the city, they discover how the Purge affects groups like the homeless, people needing government aid, and many others. This approach helps make the quiet moments in between the action feel more important, as it pulls back to reveal the potential for layers in the Purge Universe that a lesser film might not attempt to look into. Much of the action is enjoyable enough for a summer blockbuster, and smartly places its emphasis on the characters we have grown to enjoy, in a setting that hides enough depth to keep audiences interested.

The Purge: Election Year is not the sequel we should have gotten, at least not entirely. The potential for a truly great film is hidden behind the clutter, and enough talent and commitment has been brought by the actors and writers to suggest something great could be made out of this franchise. As it stands, however, the films’ oversimplification on key elements and lack of anything original to say hold back what could have been a smart horror sequel. While still certainly worth a watch, Election Year is, more often than not, politics as usual.


Arbitrary Numerical Rating: 6 Creative Murder Masks out of 10


One comment

  1. Zack · July 6, 2016

    You really grilloed this one Andy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s